Gullible Marketing
By Chris Keene at July 11, 2008 4 Comments
I used to think that marketing had to do with adjectives: better, shinier, fat-free. I now think marketing has to do with nouns and gullibility - let me explain.
Gullible marketing is based on the premise that customers believe everything that they hear. You assume that a customer cannot distinguish one company’s hype (shiny toaster) from another’s (fat-free toaster).
In gullible marketing, you cannot win be asserting that you do things better than your competitors. You can only win by talking about different things than any of your competitors.
This brings us to the buzzword-filled world of Web 2.0. It is almost impossible to differentiate one RIA, Ajax, Saas-enabled development tool from another. In the gullible marketing world, Backbase, Nexaweb, Jackbe, Appcelerator and WaveMaker all look the same (if we all merged, we could call ourselves Back-nexa-jack-app-wave).
Gullible marketing would say that no customer can distinguish between our buzzword-laden pitches without a great deal of effort. Thus any time they hear similar-sounding claims from two vendors they get a sort of used-car salesman feeling that leaves them confused and dejected.
Vendor 1: Bright and shiny Ajax, RIA, Web 2.0 tools!
Vendor 2: Brighter, shinier and velvet stippled RIA, Enterprise Web 2.0 tools!!
Customer: sigh…I guess I’ll wait to see what Microsoft gives me
Once customers are confused, they are likely to do nothing at all, just wait for the market develop to a point where there is a clear market leader. As a vendor, then, the trick is to say something unique to customers that they aren’t hearing from anyone else and hence aren’t confused about.
- Avoid adjective-driven differentiation. In the tech world, the adjectives faster, better and cheaper have been overused to the point of meaningless
- Stake out a unique nouns. Focus your messaging on something that nobody else is saying. For example, WaveMaker is the only browser-based web development tool that you can ship as a part of your application - which is a handy thing for ISVs.
- Start with small nouns. The implicit market size of the noun you stake out should be roughly equivalent to the size and momentum of your company. If you are a small company, try to own a little noun first. For example, shipping a browser-based customization tool with your application is going to only appeal to ISV’s trying to web-enable their products, a relatively small segment of the web development space.
Another way of explaining gullible marketing is that customers believe none of what they hear from vendors, but that would be too depressing for me as a vendor to contemplate, so I prefer to think of them as gullible instead.
Tags: positioning
RSS
People
Groups 

4 Comments
Hey Chris - Thanks for the interesting read, esp for us marketers…there were moments when it seemed like you were equating Gullible Marketing (”talking about different things than any of your competitors”) with Blue Ocean Strategy. Given your INSEAD connection, is this so (or should I definitely stop business reading after 4pm on Friday afternoons?!). - Is respect-based marketing completely out the window in your POV? Or just irrelevant/ineffective?
Thanks, - Lucie
You found me out - I am a big fan of Blue Ocean Strategy! I am not trying to imply that customers are truly gullible, only that they are lazy, in the sense that they will not take the time to resolve competing competitor claims unless they have a burning reason to do so (which usually they don’t!)
Thanks, Chris…I did get it (we could have a Blue Ocean SIG, maybe; I’m a big fan, too). However, maybe the finger and “lazy” attribution belong more with us marketers and less with besieged customers…and then, there’s the weekend… ; )
I always had a feeling a marketer could say what Lucie said.
Chris, do lazy customers make better customers, in your opinion?