This Isn’t About The New iPhone
By Sebastien Provencher at June 12, 2008 3 CommentsIt seems like everyone is excited about the new iPhone that was introduced by Apple on Monday (many people are actually calling it the Jesusphone) but I think everyone’s missing the big picture.
What triggered those thoughts was yesterday’s blog post from Mashable, discussing what was really revolutionary about the new iPhone:
And, The Really Big Thing About The New iPhone Is… GPS. Global Positioning System . Geo-anything. Location based services. (…) Why hasn’t all this happened before? Three words: ease of use. While you could have done all these things for the Symbian or Blackberry or Windows ME platforms (provided the device had GPS capabilities), it just took too many clicks and required too much fidgeting for any of it to get mass appeal.
I actually agree with that statement. The iPhone is well designed, it’s very easy to use, it’s now location-aware and the touchscreen navigation is amazing…
BUT…
- RIM (Blackberry) is working on a similar device
- Nokia is working on a similar device
- Samsung is working on a similar device
- HTC is probably working on a similar device
- Google might be working on a GooglePhone
I give kudos to Apple for innovating, creating a user-focused device and forcing change in a market that badly needed the kick in the pants but, the same way the social Web is not about Facebook, Friendfeed or Twitter, the mobile Web is not about Apple and the iPhone. It’s about permanent change in the way we access the mobile Web and that’s good. But, it’s certainly not about the iPhone…
Update1: David Pogue from the New York Times reviews the Samsung Instinct.
Labels: Apple, GPS, iPhone, Local Search, mobile web
RSS




3 Comments
“HTC is probably working on a similar device”
“Google might be working on a GooglePhone”
Might? Probably? Someone needs to read the news. HTC has demonstrated Google’s Android platform running on one of their phones.
The reasoning behind your conclusion is as solid as air. “X is working on something similar”? The competition is 1-2 years late out of the starting gate, and the Facebook comparison is the wrong one. A much better comparison is portable music player hardware. How long has the competition been working on catching up to iPod? How’s that working out for them? In this space, against these competitors, I’ll place my bets on Apple.
Anyone heard of Android? Just checking