Click Fraud Claims 28% Of Search Ads
By Daya Baran at February 20, 2008 3 Comments|
According to Click Forensics, click fraud rates for content networks grew to 28.3% in Q4 2007. In other words 28 cents from every dollar went to fraud. What this report is saying is 28.3% of (PPC) providers and publishers revenue/profits are attributed to fraud. I found it disturbing that the rate was so high and if concerned that advertisers could use the information to take legal action against pay-per-click (PPC) providers and publishers to reclaim their ad spend. So I set out to clarify it. I asked Click Forensics CEO Tom Cuthbert if he could provide me more information about the sample and ad spend size. A company spokesman responded “Our data is derived from a statistically significant sample of live PPC campaigns from the 4,000 advertisers, agencies publishers. We do not share data on the spend size. However, our advertisers include top ten financial services, retail and travel companies as well as smaller businesses. It is representative of the search advertising industry as a whole and crosses multiple search engines and publisher networks.” “In 2007 we saw a significant jump in the industry average click fraud rate when compared with the average rate for 2006,” said Tom Cuthbert, president and CEO of Click Forensics. “As the FBI and USAToday have reported, fraudsters are using more sophisticated means to perpetrate click fraud, including infiltrating mom-and-pop e-commerce sites. As a result it’s more important than ever before for advertisers, publishers, ad networks and search engines to cooperate and share data in order to stem what’s on target to be an even worse problem in 2008.” Some of key findings from the report include:
|
Tags:
Click Fraud, Online Advertising, Search



3 Comments
This disturbs you only because it provides advertisers with ammunition to recover their wasted ad money? Does it not disturb you that content-based advertising is far more expensive per genuine click than the claimed cost? Or that content-based advertising provides a perfect vehicle for fraudulent activity? In my experience, at least 80% of content-based advertising expense, and likely higher, was wasted on click fraud, with most of the clicks coming from obscure sites that no one interested in our products would have visited in the first place. We terminated the campaign, but unfortunately the search engine only denied all claims and refused to refund any of the cost. Hopefully someone can use this study to recover some squandered investment.
I guess you miss read it. It disturbs me that the click fraud rate is so high.
Perhaps I’m not getting the gist. When I read, ‘I found this disturbing because advertisers could use the information to take legal action against pay-per-click (PPC) providers’ it sounds like the concern is that legal action may be taken, not that the results are high. In any case, I am in agreement with you, it’s disturbing, but not surprising to anyone who’s tried a content-based advertising campaign.